ST-SEGMENT-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION in COVID-19

Introduction: The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events including acute myocardial infarction due to a prothrombotic and hypercoagulable status, and endothelial dysfunction. Case report: We report the case of a 62-year-old women, admitted to the hospital via the emergency room for acute chest pain and dyspnea. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive for COVID19 real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction 11 day ago. On admission, she was hypotensive with systolic blood pressure measering 87 mmHg and tachycardic with 117 beats/min, oxygen saturation (SO2) was 94%. An 18-lead ECG revealed an infero-postero-lateral ST-elevation myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement and a seconddegree- Mobitz Type 1 atrioventricular block. The coronary angiography from the right femoral artery showed acute thrombotic occlusion of the first diagonal branch with TIMI 0 flow and acute thrombotic occlusion of proximal right coronary artery with TIMI 0 flow. The most likely diagnosis was myocardial infarction secondary to a non-atherosclerotic coronary occlusion. The angioplasy was performed with dilatations with a semi compliant balloon, bailout implant of BMS, manual thrombus aspiration and intracoronary injection of tirofiban in the right coronary artery. The myocardial revascularization was ineffective. The patient developed significant severe hemodynamic instability and cardiac arrest for pulseless electric activity after 24 hours. Conclusion(s): The COVID-19 outbreak implies deep changes in the clinical profile and therapeutic management of STEMI patients who underwent PCI. At present, the natural history of coronary embolism is not well understood;however, the cardiac mortality rate are hight. This suggests these patients require further study to identify the natural history of the condition and to optimize management to improve outcome.

Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Revascularization During Current Pandemics, New Hope! - Our Experience in a Third World Country

Objective: Since the last decade, the notion of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gained worldwide rapid popularity. Bangladesh is not far from mastering this technique due to the increasing interest of both patients and surgeons. Meanwhile, during this COVID-19 era could it help patients, remains the main question. In this context, we have operated on a total of 523 patients from October 2020 to November 2021 including, 89 patients who were MICS and among them, 17 were coronary artery bypass grafting. Method(s): We have included all patients who underwent minimally invasive coronary artery surgery in our hospital from October 2020 to November 2021 irrespective of single (MIDCAB) / multi-vessel disease (MICAS) or combined valve replacement with coronary revascularization. Data were collected from the hospital database, telephone conversations, and direct clinic visits. All data were analyzed statistically and expressed in the form of tables. Result(s): In the last 14 months of pandemics we have operated on a total of 89 MICS patients, among them 10 were Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass (MIDCAB), 6 were double or triple vessels coronary artery surgery (MICAS), 1 patient underwent upper-mini aortic valve replacement along with coronary revascularization. One of our patients needed re-exploration for chest wall bleeding on the same day. Mean ICU and hospital stay in our series were less than conventional revascularization. There was no in-hospital or 30 days' mortality in our series. Conclusion(s): Cardiac surgery these days is headed toward less invasive approaches with the aid of technology, advanced instruments, and pioneer's lead. But from our in-hospital results we conclude that by avoiding median sternotomy, these minimal invasive revascularization techniques can provide hope to the patients by alleviating symptoms with restored vascularity, reduced morbidity, preventing sudden cardiac death. Health costs reduction with shorter hospital and ICU stay are the added benefits.

Post-COVID-19 cardiovascular complications and their association with clinical characteristics, symptoms and comorbidities - the LATE-COVID study

Background: Among many complications of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) there is a wide range of cardiovascular (CV) problems ranging from mild to severe ones. Even asymptomatic patients and those with mild course of COVID-19 may develop severe CV complications. Factors leading to such state have not been extensively studied so far. Purpose(s): We aimed to assess which factors were linked to the severe complications of COVID-19. Method(s): We included 200 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology and Adult Congenital Heart Diseases of the Polish Mother's Memorial Research Institute (PMMHRI) due to post-Covid cardiovascular complications. SARS-CoV2 infection was confirmed with real-life PCR testing. Laboratory tests, 24-hour ECG monitoring and echocardiography were performed in all patients from the investigated group. For the purposes of our study severe complications were defined as: Myocarditis, a decrease of ejection fraction >10% from the pre-disease value, thromboembolic complications, angina pectoris requiring myocardial revascularization and the new onset of atrial fibrillation of supraventricular tachycardia. Some patients presented more than one of the above. Statistical analysis was performed using the software Statistica v.13 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). Data were presented as mean +/-SD or median (25th- 75th percentile) for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. Comparisons between groups were performed using Student's t-test for independent variables and the Mann-Whitney U test or chi2 test with Yates's correction, as appropriate. For all calculations p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Result(s): Finally, we included 200 consecutive patients (aged 54+/-16 years, 76 males - 38%), hospitalized for COVID-19 complications after a median 3 (2-6) months following the acute phase of infection. On admission patients presented with dyspnea (23%), impairment of exercise tolerance (47%), chest pain (32%), increase in blood pressure (29%), palpitations (25%), weight loss (13%), brain fog (6%), general malaise (11%), headache (5%), limb pain (13%), swelling (14%). Severe complications of COVID-19 were diagnosed in 31 patients (16%).Taking into consideration symptoms, the presence of severe COVID-19 complications was significantly associated with dyspnoea and deterioration of exercise tolerance. In comparison to patients with mild complications, severe ones were linked to age (the older patients, the higher risk), previous history of heart failure and diabetes mellitus. We did not observe statistically significant differences in severity of complications depending on smoking status (Tables 1 and 2). Conclusion(s): Previous history of heart failure and diabetes mellitus as well as symptoms (dyspnoea and deterioration of exercise tolerance) along with older age are related to more severe complications following COVID- 19.

Specific characteristics of STEMI in COVID-19 patients and their practical implications: A systematic review

Introduction: STEMI is one of the cardiac emergencies whose management has been mostly challenged by the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients presenting with the "lethal combo" of STEMI and concomitant SARS-CoV- 2 infection have faced dramatic issues related to need for self-isolation, systemic inflammation with multi-organ disease, and difficulties to obtain timely diagnosis and treatment. Method(s):We performed a systematic search of three electronic databases from February 1st 2020 to January 31st 2022. We included all studies reporting crude rates of in-hospital outcomes of STEMI patients with concomitant COVID-19. Result(s): A total of 9 observational studies were identified, mainly conducted during the first wave of the pandemic. STEMI patients with COVID -19 were more likely Afro-American and displayed higher rates of hypertension and diabetes with lower smoking prevalence. Associated comorbidities, including coronary artery disease, prior stroke and chronic kidney disease were also more common in those with SARS-CoV-2 infection. At coronary angiography, a higher thrombus burden in COVID-19 positive STEMI patients was highlighted, with up to 10-fold higher rates of stent thrombosis and greater need for glycoprotein IIb/IIa inhibitors and aspiration thrombectomy;this was not always associated with prolonged times from symptom onset to hospital admission and door-to-balloon. COVID-19 positive STEMI patients were less likely to receive coronary angiography and primary PCI, and more likely to be treated with fibrinolytics only. At the same time, patients with Covid-19 were more prone to present MINOCA. In-hospital mortality ranged from 15% to 40%, with consistent variability across different studies and subjects who tested positive for SARS-CoV- 2 did also present higher rates of cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, prolonged ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, major bleeding, and stroke. Conclusion(s): The coexistence of STEMI and COVID-19 was associated with increased in-hospital mortality and poor short-term prognosis. This was not entirely attributable to logistic issues determining delayed coronary revascularization, since patients' specific clinical and angiographic characteristics, including higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors and greater coronary thrombogenicity might have substantially contributed to this trend. (Figure Presented).

The Impact of the Covid19 Pandemic on Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Background The impact of COVID-19 on major adverse lower extremity (MALE) and cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is unknown. Methods Using the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, Veterans with PAD were identified. Rates of MALE (amputation or lower extremity revascularization [LER]), and MACE (death, MI, or coronary revascularization) were assessed in pre-pandemic (3/11/2019-3/10/2020), early-pandemic (3/11/2020-3/10/2021), and late-pandemic (3/11/2021-3/10/2022) periods. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier method. Results Of 418,042 Veterans (mean age 72 yrs) with PAD, 76.7% were white and 96.8% male. Furthermore, 89.2% had HTN, 60.4% diabetes, 49.3% CAD, 21.6% heart failure, and 20.5% atrial fibrillation. From 3/11/2019 to 3/10/2022, 3,100 had amputation, 8,187 had LER, & 2,229 had MACE. Amputation rates declined and continued to decline in early- and late-pandemic period (306 to 268 to 235;p<0.001;rates per 100k). Rates of LER declined initially and stabilized in late-pandemic period (951 to 587 to 609;p < 0.001;rates per 100k). MACE did not change significantly. (215 to 168 to 202;p<0.001;rates per 100k). Conclusion Amputation rates in Veterans with PAD did not increase despite a clinically significant decline in LER. Given the known efficacy of noninvasive therapies in PAD, these data suggest that there is a need to re-evaluate appropriate indications for LER and amputation. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation

Enterogenous Cyst and Glioblastoma: A Brief Histopathological Review of Two Uncommon Cystic Lesions of the Central Nervous System

Intracranial cystic lesions are common findings in cerebral imaging and might represent a broad spectrum of conditions. These entities can be divided into nonneoplastic lesions, comprising Rathke cleft cyst, arachnoid cyst, and colloid cyst, as well as neoplastic lesions, including benign and malignant components of neoplasms such as pilocytic astrocytoma, hemangioblastoma, and ganglioglioma. Surgical resection and histological evaluation are currently the most effective methods to classify cysts of the central nervous system. The authors report two uncommon cases presenting as cystic lesions of the encephalic parenchyma-a enterogenous cyst and a glioblastoma-and discuss typical histological findings and differential diagnosis.

Coronary Heart Disease and Coronavirus Disease 2019: Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, Association with Myocardial Revascularization

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a hypercoagulable state with a high incidence of thrombotic complications. Patients with a history of myocardial revascularization have more severe complications due to COVID-19. Coronary stent thrombosis has become significantly more common during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIM: The aim of our study is to analyze scientific information on the risks of stent thrombosis in patients who underwent COVID-19. METHODS: A search was made for scientific publications in evidence-based medicine databases and web resources: PubMed, MEDLINE, UpToDate, TripDatabase, ResearchGate, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were: (1) Observational studies or case series involving patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and myocardial infarction requiring myocardial revascularization;(2) the division of the population into survivors and non-survivors;and (3) data on the presence of the previous myocardial revascularization. Exclusion criteria: Case description and editorials/bulletins. In all articles selected for further analysis, 49 sources were considered that met the inclusion criteria and excluded duplication or repetition of information. RESULTS: Coronavirus infection has contributed to the change in the course of myocardial infarction in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. The incidence of stent thrombosis has a positive correlation with the severity of the coronavirus infection. The previous myocardial revascularization procedures significantly increase the risk of mortality in patients with coronavirus infection. This is especially actual for elderly patients. CONCLUSION: One of the most vulnerable groups is elderly patients who have undergone myocardial revascularization after myocardial infarction in the past and have concomitant diseases. An analysis of scientific publications has shown that further larger-scale clinical studies are needed to confirm the hypothesis about the negative impact of coronavirus infection on stent thrombosis in patients who have undergone COVID-19.

Current lipid-lowering approach and LDL target achievement in very high-risk patients: in-hospital results of a high-volume primary percutaneous coronary intervention tertiary center

Background: Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is a well-accepted causal risk factor for atherothrombotic cardiovascular disease. Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that lipid-lowering therapies reduce cardiovascular events and have a positive effect in reducing vulnerable plaques. In particular, the recommended target for LDL-C has become more and more stringent, moving to 1.4 mmol/l (55 mg/dl) for very high-risk patients. According to the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines, the current paradigm for lipid management favors a stepwise approach consisting of early initiation of high-intensity statin, followed by subsequent addition of ezetimibe, and ultimately a consideration of PCSK9 inhibitor treatment if LDL-C levels remain elevated. Methods: We recruited 307 patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the COVID-19 pandemic from March 2020 to December 2020. Baseline LDL-C concentration and prescribed hypolipemiant treatment at hospital admission and discharge were registered. Therefore, we included all consecutive patients identified as very-high cardiovascular risk, according to 2019 ESC guidelines. We stratified our population through variables independently associated with non-attainment of LDL-cholesterol such as hypertension, diabetes, peripheral arterial disease, clinical manifestations of ACS, number of main vessels treated, and complexity of the atherosclerotic disease. Results: 274 patients were included. Mean age was 69,9 years (SD 11,4), 20,8%were women, 23,7%had diabetes, 16,4%had PAD and 32,1 % suffered from valvular disease, mainly with mitral regurgitation or aortic stenosis no more than mild or moderate. Of 25.1% with a previous history of acute myocardial infarction, the 33,3% of whom didn't have statin therapy pre-ACS index (p =0,001). At admission, medium cholesterol levels of patients that underwent previous coronary revascularization (25,5% of the total population) were 84,21 ± 31,2 mg/dL, not in range according to both 2016 and 2019 ESC guidelines. At discharge, 77,37 % of all the patients included received only statin therapy VS 22,63% with statin plus ezetimibe. In the subpopulation of patients with recurring ACS events with LDL pre-admission > 100 mg/dL,despite high dose statin, only 25% of this population were discharged adding ezetimibe (VS 75% who kept on the treatment of high dose statin without up-titration). Conclusions: Management of dyslipidemia is frequently suboptimal and the gap between guidelines and clinical practice for lipid management across Europe has been exacerbated by the 2019 guidelines. A greater utilization of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies is likely needed to reach the LDL-C optimal target. A correct stratification of the risk class would help to identify, in a personalized perspective of treatment, patients at very high risk that would take advantage of more aggressive therapy to reach the lowest target of LDL-C ('the lower is better'). (Figure Presented).

Trends in major adverse cardiac events during the covid-19 pandemic in alberta, canada

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and care globally, although to date, limited data exist on the Canadian experience. This study aimed to describe trends in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)/procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Province of Alberta, Canada. Methods: A repeated cross-sectional study design compared MACE from inpatient and emergency department visits among Albertan adults between March 15, 2019, and September 14, 2020. The Alberta population was 4.4 million in 2020 and all residents are part of a single payer healthcare system. The percent change between each MACE reported in the control (2019) and COVID-19 restriction periods (2020) were calculated. MACE were defined individually and as a primary composite outcome (CV death, acute coronary syndrome [ACS], ischemic stroke, or coronary revascularization procedures). These preliminary data are part of an ongoing study, measuring outcomes throughout the first year of the pandemic. Results: Compared to March-June 2019, primary MACE during the initial COVID-19 restriction period (March-June 2020) decreased by 15.6% (n=739 patients), and by 7.3% (n=342 patients) during June-September 2020, when COVID-19 restrictions were eased. Most individual MACE followed similar patterns with reduced reported events/procedures during the initial restriction period and an increase towards previous rates thereafter (Figure 1): CV death (17.7% vs 10.2%), ACS (19.1% vs 8.4%), coronary revascularization (17.0% vs 9.2%). The exception was ischemic stroke, which was not notably impacted by pandemic restrictions. Conclusions: Declines in MACE/procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic are suggestive of a substantial gap in patient management and healthcare-seeking behaviour that may have negative downstream implications. Ongoing analyses will further explore reported MACE up to one year after the pandemic began.

COVID-19 pandemic triggers acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in non-infected individuals: The final results of the JoCORE study

Introduction: The relentless COVID-19 pandemic caused a devastating sickness and loss of life at a global level. The stress related to the pandemic lockdown and near total paralysis of most human activities was associated with behavioral changes. It is largely unknown if these stresses could trigger acute cardiovascular events among non-infected individuals. Purpose: To explore the relation between COVID-19 associated stresses and acute cardiovascular events among non-infected individuals. Methods: Adult patients presented with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) at 11 hospitals in Jordan from March 2020 through February 2021 were assessed for potential exposure to stressful life events related to the COVID-19 pandemic. None of the patients was COVID-19 infected or a health care worker. Results: Of 297 patients enrolled (mean age 58.4±13.1 years, 18.5% females), 267 patients (89.8%) had AMI, 15 patients (5.1%) had stroke, and 15 patients (5.1%) had OHCA. Cigarette smoking was present in 59.6%, hypertension in 50.5%, dyslipidemia in 42.8%, diabetes in 37.4%, and 35% had prior diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Coronary revascularization was performed in 228 (85.4%) of AMI patients. In-hospital mortality among the AMI and stroke patients was 4.3% and none of the OHCA patients survived. The most common stresses preceded these events included financial hardships (50.8%), lockdown stress (25.9%), fears from the pandemic (24.9%), anger (22.6%), loneliness (19.2%), smoking binges (19.9%), death of a significant person (6.4%), and food binges (3.4%). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown caused immense psychosocial and financial stresses that triggered life threatening acute cardiovascular events in non-infected individuals. Early recognition of stress-related symptoms during this unremitting pandemic warrants proper referral and evaluation.